Why Was This Player Not Folloowed Up On
#41
Posted 22 July 2014 - 07:59 PM
#42
Posted 22 July 2014 - 08:08 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 22 July 2014 - 07:59 PM, said:
projected 7k
first season at proact was just under 7k (6930 or summat)
hoping that good football would bring similar amounts of home fans as the other promotion season
not the worst ball park guess ever made and certainly not as bad as some are making out
#43
Posted 23 July 2014 - 05:13 PM
Cartman, on 22 July 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:
that isn't too far fetched surely?
and again, to take what he said as a personal insult is ridiculous!
He thought we would get more fans than the time we last got promoted?
And you think that isn't too far fetched?
Really?
#44
Posted 23 July 2014 - 05:56 PM
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 05:13 PM, said:
And you think that isn't too far fetched?
Really?
not as if the forecast was 1000s more or even 100s more it was the nearest round number to what we go last time
so of course it is not too far fetched
to suggest it is is just silly
#45
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:01 PM
I'm just trying to get my ducks in a line here, I'm sure you understand. Because I cannot possibly believe that any of our fans wouldn't think that's far fetched. It seems downright idiotic to me.
#46
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:07 PM
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 06:01 PM, said:
I'm just trying to get my ducks in a line here, I'm sure you understand. Because I cannot possibly believe that any of our fans wouldn't think that's far fetched. It seems downright idiotic to me.
teh prediction was only slightly higher, the way you are going on you would think they predicted 10000 average gates - they didn't
if you are forcasting volumes in any business you go on what has happened before, so it is entirely sensible to predict a number based on what we had the last time we had a decent team with a chance of winning the league
And listing attacking talents of Lester, Davies is irrelevent as well, last season we were amongst the league's top scorers and were watching attacking talents such as Gary Roberts, Jay O'Shea, Ollie Banks, Dan Gardner etc etc
The forecast turned out to be wrong, but going on and on about it being idiotic is just stupid when it was based on the attendances we got during another promotion season
You need to find some other stuff to slate CT/DA about because the attendance forecast was not out of the realms of reality
#47
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:08 PM
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 06:01 PM, said:
I'm just trying to get my ducks in a line here, I'm sure you understand. Because I cannot possibly believe that any of our fans wouldn't think that's far fetched. It seems downright idiotic to me.
And not only that, surely you budget sensibly (lower mid range) and not forecast at the top end hoping that everything goes swimmingly. Surely it’s foolish to work like that.
How can you set a high budget and then spend over this and then wonder why you have such a deficit when you fall way short of your target?
#48
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:08 PM
Your constant over exaggerations are incredibly boring by the way. You can give them a rest, like. Wait, I need to use your favourite buzzwords - they're 'idiotic' and 'stupid'.
This post has been edited by Goku: 23 July 2014 - 06:09 PM
#49
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:13 PM
Cartman, on 23 July 2014 - 06:07 PM, said:
if you are forcasting volumes in any business you go on what has happened before, so it is entirely sensible to predict a number based on what we had the last time we had a decent team with a chance of winning the league
And listing attacking talents of Lester, Davies is irrelevent as well, last season we were amongst the league's top scorers and were watching attacking talents such as Gary Roberts, Jay O'Shea, Ollie Banks, Dan Gardner etc etc
The forecast turned out to be wrong, but going on and on about it being idiotic is just stupid when it was based on the attendances we got during another promotion season
You need to find some other stuff to slate CT/DA about because the attendance forecast was not out of the realms of reality
if you estimate the gates to be 7k then that's surely the max you expect given there was just one local game and one sell out, compared to last time.
So you would surely revise that estimate, or at least revise the budget - base the budget on 6500 - if its better it allows strengthening in Jan if not your not running a huge loss.
#50
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:15 PM
Spireite-Karl, on 23 July 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:
How can you set a high budget and then spend over this and then wonder why you have such a deficit when you fall way short of your target?
it is only foolish with hindsight
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:
Your constant over exaggerations are incredibly boring by the way. You can give them a rest, like. Wait, I need to use your favourite buzzwords - they're 'idiotic' and 'stupid'.
far from it
I am just not an over the top needy muppet who over reacts at everything that comes out of the club and can be realistic enough to see that we are not in a bad position at the moment and can see that people are moaning for moanings sake
#51
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:19 PM
a kick in the balls, on 23 July 2014 - 06:13 PM, said:
So you would surely revise that estimate, or at least revise the budget - base the budget on 6500 - if its better it allows strengthening in Jan if not your not running a huge loss.
with hindsight that would have been sensible
I would have expected them to revise the predictions at least a few times through the season anyway - appears they did not
And anyway, this 7k prediction is being used a way to try and deflect critisism about the club not spending loads in pre season and as part of a chairman's rallying cry to get more fans - perhaps an ill advised thing to make public, but people are taking what DA said far too personally
But the fact remains that you predict volumes based on what has gone before, we have had one promotion season at the Proact and averaged around 7k, therefore a 7k prediction based on thinking you'll be at the top all season is not far fetched at all
#52
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:20 PM
Cartman, on 23 July 2014 - 06:15 PM, said:
Correct, but not much foresight was there. You budget high, then spend over this and wonder why it's all fallen flat? Give me a break
#53
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:21 PM
Cartman, on 23 July 2014 - 06:19 PM, said:
I would have expected them to revise the predictions at least a few times through the season anyway - appears they did not
And anyway, this 7k prediction is being used a way to try and deflect critisism about the club not spending loads in pre season and as part of a chairman's rallying cry to get more fans - perhaps an ill advised thing to make public, but people are taking what DA said far too personally
But the fact remains that you predict volumes based on what has gone before, we have had one promotion season at the Proact and averaged around 7k, therefore a 7k prediction based on thinking you'll be at the top all season is not far fetched at all
well you wouldn't have needed to be a genius to see what could happen if you fall short, and err on the side of caution.
#54
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:23 PM
[As a side note - things may well go swimmingly this season, we may finish mid table for all I know - it will still not excuse the rank idiocy and amateurishness emanating from this club over recent months]
This post has been edited by Goku: 23 July 2014 - 06:25 PM
#55
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:24 PM
Spireite-Karl, on 23 July 2014 - 06:20 PM, said:
for the hundreth time, basing a forecast on what has gone before is normal and what is done in all businesses when predicting volume
#56
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:28 PM
a kick in the balls, on 23 July 2014 - 06:21 PM, said:
Fair point
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:
[As a side note - things may well go swimmingly this season, we may finish mid table for all I know - it will still not excuse the rank idiocy and amateurishness emanating from this club over recent months]
Most town fans are thick, just go to games and this becomes clear - in fact most football fans in general are thick, as most of the general public are - you only have to look at the fact Katie Price is a celebrity or that reality TV shows are watched to figure this out
A lot of fans on here are needy and want to be updated by the club every 10 minutes and expect transfer dealings to be public
We are capable of scoring goals as we were last season without a 'main' striker
And yes I am right, as I usually am!
#57
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:32 PM
Goku, on 23 July 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:
Your constant over exaggerations are incredibly boring by the way. You can give them a rest, like. Wait, I need to use your favourite buzzwords - they're 'idiotic' and 'stupid'.
The forecast was on the optimistic side, no more than that. The result of it was that PC was able to bring in players of the calibre of Morsy, Ryan, Evatt and Roberts. These are players we would be chuffed at signing now, so all we did was get the good stuff in a year early.
So this time we're a bit short of readies? Not a big deal, the most important part of the squad is signed up and ready to go. A new striker would be nice, but the way we're set up is to share the goals between the front four. Somebody to win and hold up the ball would be handy, but not necessarily a big money, big goals striker - Parkin or someone similar would do nicely.
Incidentally, what would you have said if the attendance had been underestimated, PC was left with rubbish and we'd finished up mid table? Forecasting is a difficult art, and the consequences are dramatic.
#58
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:35 PM
h again, on 23 July 2014 - 06:32 PM, said:
So this time we're a bit short of readies? Not a big deal, the most important part of the squad is signed up and ready to go. A new striker would be nice, but the way we're set up is to share the goals between the front four. Somebody to win and hold up the ball would be handy, but not necessarily a big money, big goals striker - Parkin or someone similar would do nicely.
Incidentally, what would you have said if the attendance had been underestimated, PC was left with rubbish and we'd finished up mid table? Forecasting is a difficult art, and the consequences are dramatic.
Disagree that Parkin would have been a viable option, he's gone to non league for a reason
The point on forecasts is a good one
Imagine the uproar on here if DA had forecasted 5k attendances and we had not signed half the players we did and ended up 8th!
#59
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:38 PM
Cartman, on 23 July 2014 - 06:24 PM, said:
Football is not like any other business though is it? Besides, I'm sure any business wouldn't forecast at the very top end and then proceed to overspend this when the forecast was nowhere near being met and then proceed. Surely only a glance at how the forecast was holding up would have set the alarm bells ringing and this would have been revised, not keep spending. Don’t you find that a tad worrying?
Basically either nobody had their eye on this OR DA thought the concerts would pull this back.
#60
Posted 23 July 2014 - 06:42 PM
h again, on 23 July 2014 - 06:32 PM, said:
So this time we're a bit short of readies? Not a big deal, the most important part of the squad is signed up and ready to go. A new striker would be nice, but the way we're set up is to share the goals between the front four. Somebody to win and hold up the ball would be handy, but not necessarily a big money, big goals striker - Parkin or someone similar would do nicely.
Incidentally, what would you have said if the attendance had been underestimated, PC was left with rubbish and we'd finished up mid table? Forecasting is a difficult art, and the consequences are dramatic.
I'm sure PC agrees with you.