[brockwell-spireite]

dim view, on 07 May 2017 - 09:03 AM, said:

I drew the conclusion from your post that Liam Graham's affairs affect your business life. That's because you praise AG's post and he told us that Liam didn't have an agent but now he does. If you don't like people drawing those conclusions then either keep clear of online forums or weigh up the probability of that conclusion being drawn before you hit the enter key. People might say I'm wrong to draw that conclusion but that's a chance I have to take without getting mardy.

I praised the way he articulated his post not the content, my post was mainly in response to the fact that it was being suggested that he'd suddenly dissapeared for sinister reasons when to me it was pretty clear why he had posted from his opening statement, given the length of his post and how far back he was quoting he'd obviously been reading for a long time before he decided to respond and I'm sure given the tone that he probably didn't want to but felt he had to. I wasn't having a dig at you regarding the 500 euros and £1000 reference either just giving an example that not everything that's posted is accurate, you are absolutely right people can draw their own conclusions but when they are posted online then it starts to become more complicated. Again, apologies if you took my post post as a threat, I was more annoyed by the wording than the question.

[Benno Spire]

For the avoidance of doubt, All my future posts will now be commission based. I am not willing to disclose any commission I receive for my comments.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

brockwell-spireite, on 07 May 2017 - 09:15 AM, said:

I praised the way he articulated his post not the content, my post was mainly in response to the fact that it was being suggested that he'd suddenly dissapeared for sinister reasons when to me it was pretty clear why he had posted from his opening statement, given the length of his post and how far back he was quoting he'd obviously been reading for a long time before he decided to respond and I'm sure given the tone that he probably didn't want to but felt he had to. I wasn't having a dig at you regarding the 500 euros and £1000 reference either just giving an example that not everything that's posted is accurate, you are absolutely right people can draw their own conclusions but when they are posted online then it starts to become more complicated. Again, apologies if you took my post post as a threat, I was more annoyed by the wording than the question.

As I've already stated 'AG's' appearance was, in my view, just an attempt to portray an out of contract player with whom he has a relationship in a better light.

Nowt wrong with that.

However my understanding is that information has been passed to supporters that contradicts at least some of what this 'AG' stated, especially regarding Dennis Bingham's association with the young man.

Perhaps your grievance should be with the person revealing such matters, and why he's doing so, rather than fans merely seeking to clarify various issues.

For what it's worth I agree employees' contracts should remain private - which is why I'm troubled to hear allegations that details of Academy staff are being demanded by and handed to an utterly unqualified individual.