[Westbars Spireite]

 60s 70s Spireite, on 14 May 2019 - 06:03 PM, said:

Does this one still stand, also announced by IFAB in March?
There will be no rebounds from penalties. Play will stop for a restart if a penalty is saved or hits the post, meaning there will be no chance to follow up and score from rebounds, meaning players will no longer need to line up on the edge of the area.
Edit.
Answer No:
Falsely reported by Sky and other media apparently, after it was agreed not take this one further
https://www.90min.co...-not-among-them

I don't see any reason to change it. Encroachment should be more closely monitored.

[JonB]

 Westbars Spireite, on 14 May 2019 - 08:10 PM, said:

I don't see any reason to change it. Encroachment should be more closely monitored.

Pretty sure the rules are there to deal with it already as are the ones to deal with holding at corners etc. Just needs refs to do their job and enforce them.

[Benno Spire]

Would be nice if they enforced the old rules.
The number of times in all divisions I saw foul throws go unpunished

[JonB]

 Benno Spire, on 14 May 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

Would be nice if they enforced the old rules.
The number of times in all divisions I saw foul throws go unpunished

Foul throws for what? They’ve changed the rule so you’re allowed to have a foot over the line and on the pitch a while back.

See a fair few mainly from European teams who throw it straight into the floor.

This post has been edited by JonB: 14 May 2019 - 08:55 PM

[BurySpireite]

 Quaker, on 14 May 2019 - 01:02 PM, said:

The last one is a bit harsh...

Why? They committed the infraction, whether the goal stood or not is irrelevant - punishments should be based off of intent more so than outcome.

I mean if you wanna argue that punishments for celebrations in general are harsh then fair enough, but if they're going to be part of the game they should be given regardless. You can still get sent off for a foul even after play has stopped, I don't see why the legitimacy of the goal should make a difference.

[azul]

 Ernie Ernie Ernie, on 14 May 2019 - 06:03 PM, said:

I’d say making a player go off the field, after receiving treatment, to be then waved back on when the ref wants too is a stupid one. It usually puts the team with the fouled player down to 10 whilst the team who have committed the foul retains 11 on the pitch.

That rule was introduced for a good reason and good intention, to discouarge a player feining injury.

Like most rules it is only a matter of time before it gets exploited, such as a player feigning injury then taking a minute to hobble off and behold, 3 or 4 minutes have been wasted. The player is waved on almost immediately and he may or may not be out of position.

[metallilad]

Where would the wall stop?
If an attacker stands 1m away from it then another defender joins the wall just before the kick is took, technically the attacker is stood in an illegal position and could potentially rule out a goal.

[mr. smith]

 metallilad, on 14 May 2019 - 09:42 PM, said:

Where would the wall stop?
If an attacker stands 1m away from it then another defender joins the wall just before the kick is took, technically the attacker is stood in an illegal position and could potentially rule out a goal.

Should imagine it’ll just end up stopping attackers standing in the defensive wall

[Ollerton Opinion]

Goalkeeper taking a goal kick that does not go out of the penalty area (becomes live) should be penalised with an in-direct free kick to the attacking side at the point the ball was stopped from leaving the penalty area.
This would reduce time wasting or defenders under pressure deliberately stepping inside the penalty area to make contact with the ball knowing that by doing so would result in the goal kick being re-taken.

[dalekpete]

 Ollerton Opinion, on 14 May 2019 - 10:15 PM, said:

Goalkeeper taking a goal kick that does not go out of the penalty area (becomes live) should be penalised with an in-direct free kick to the attacking side at the point the ball was stopped from leaving the penalty area.
This would reduce time wasting or defenders under pressure deliberately stepping inside the penalty area to make contact with the ball knowing that by doing so would result in the goal kick being re-taken.

I believe goalkicks and freekicks within the penalty area become live from the moment they are kicked next season rather than from when they leave the area. No doubt there will be an outcry as one is hit into the net early next season!

[dart in the crossbar]

Isn't there also a rule change regarding the goalkick? The ball can be touched inside the area after the keeping kicks it? If so, this will change the 'shape' of the game quite a bit in my opinion.

[metallilad]

 mr. smith, on 14 May 2019 - 09:53 PM, said:

Should imagine it’ll just end up stopping attackers standing in the defensive wall

That's not what I'm saying though. If they're a meter away from the wall in the first place, then a defender goes and fills that gap up by standing there, then any potential goal is ruled out because the attacker isn't a meter away from the wall.

This post has been edited by metallilad: 15 May 2019 - 06:13 AM

[dtp]

Is there a rule change which ensures the men in black apply the rules?

[JonB]

 metallilad, on 15 May 2019 - 06:12 AM, said:

That's not what I'm saying though. If they're a meter away from the wall in the first place, then a defender goes and fills that gap up by standing there, then any potential goal is ruled out because the attacker isn't a meter away from the wall.

Unless of course the attacker is within 10yds of the ball so the defender cant stand there. Also i doubt one defender will count as a wall.

[60s 70s Spireite]

 JonB, on 15 May 2019 - 07:45 AM, said:

Unless of course the attacker is within 10yds of the ball so the defender cant stand there. Also i doubt one defender will count as a wall.

A ‘wall’ is defined in the new laws, its three or more defenders.

[SatNav21]

think they should book a player if they pick the ball up and walk away with it when its not their freekick/throw in. my biggest hate at the moment watching football.

[JonB]

 SatNav21, on 15 May 2019 - 12:20 PM, said:

think they should book a player if they pick the ball up and walk away with it when its not their freekick/throw in. my biggest hate at the moment watching football.

Already covered in the rules along with kicking the ball away I would have though...again just needs enforcing.

[Westbars Spireite]

Bookings in the Premier League for gesturing for the VAR likely too.....

[JonB]

 Westbars Spireite, on 15 May 2019 - 01:36 PM, said:

Bookings in the Premier League for gesturing for the VAR likely too.....

Sure i've seen thats happening somewhere....

[60s 70s Spireite]

 Westbars Spireite, on 15 May 2019 - 01:36 PM, said:

Bookings in the Premier League for gesturing for the VAR likely too.....

Plus a red card for a player entering the VAR area...