[Spireiteboy155]

clarevoyant., on 02 October 2016 - 10:14 AM, said:

Does drinking turn you into a depressive and devoid you of all sense of reality.
Yes it was men against boys,how many of our starting XI had 30 or more league games under their belts and before people start claiming our squad ain't deep enough, how deep in reality should it be we had a better (?) Starting XI sat in the stands yesterday.
Bradford where a far better side and bossed us playing football in a very unfamiliar none bradfordian way (just shows what a Charlie Hunt off a manager parkin was.) Well done McCall. Their organisation (something we are going to struggle to get with constantly changing the side) and experience was always going to do for us.
We lost 1-0 to a momentory lack of concentration if I was a bradford fan (thank god I'm not ) I'd be asking why we didn't do better against such a depleted side bearing in mind town could have had 3, the free kick and both SH & CW could have done better with headers.
Yes men against boys but don't give me that no desire bollux

I agree with the vast majority of what you say. Nothing in here changes my view though. Yes we were inexperienced. Yes they were far better. Yes they weren't great. Well organised, but not great.
All I expected was us to throw the kitchen sink at them in the last 10 minutes to try and get something back. That never happened. Thas what I was most disappointed at

Oh, and to to say we could have scored three is, as you put in your own words, "Bollux". We wouldn't have scored 3 if we were still playing. The free kick was a great effort that drew a great save. That was it though.

[Spire-Power]

clarevoyant., on 02 October 2016 - 10:14 AM, said:

Does drinking turn you into a depressive and devoid you of all sense of reality.
Yes it was men against boys,how many of our starting XI had 30 or more league games under their belts and before people start claiming our squad ain't deep enough, how deep in reality should it be we had a better (?) Starting XI sat in the stands yesterday.
Bradford where a far better side and bossed us playing football in a very unfamiliar none bradfordian way (just shows what a Charlie Hunt off a manager parkin was.) Well done McCall. Their organisation (something we are going to struggle to get with constantly changing the side) and experience was always going to do for us.
We lost 1-0 to a momentory lack of concentration if I was a bradford fan (thank god I'm not ) I'd be asking why we didn't do better against such a depleted side bearing in mind town could have had 3, the free kick and both SH & CW could have done better with headers.
Yes men against boys but don't give me that no desire bollux

Yes Bradford looked strong all over the pitch. To only Lose 1-0 involved a slice of luck. Our players tried their best but they were simply too good for the team we were able to field. We couldn't get Gboly into the game.

[Spire-Power]

Spireiteboy155, on 02 October 2016 - 07:05 PM, said:

I agree with the vast majority of what you say. Nothing in here changes my view though. Yes we were inexperienced. Yes they were far better. Yes they weren't great. Well organised, but not great.
All I expected was us to throw the kitchen sink at them in the last 10 minutes to try and get something back. That never happened. Thas what I was most disappointed at

Oh, and to to say we could have scored three is, as you put in your own words, "Bollux". We wouldn't have scored 3 if we were still playing. The free kick was a great effort that drew a great save. That was it though.

I thought Bradford were very good. If I did betting I would back them for automatic promotion.

[Spireiteboy155]

Spire-Power, on 02 October 2016 - 07:07 PM, said:

I thought Bradford were very good. If I did betting I would back them for automatic promotion.

Definitely at least play offs. Doesn't make me feel any better though