Facebook Group
#402
Posted 22 March 2017 - 09:31 PM
#404
Posted 22 March 2017 - 09:35 PM
#406
Posted 22 March 2017 - 09:49 PM
Mr Mercury, on 22 March 2017 - 09:35 PM, said:
But I suspect it was always CT who had the "big plate"
#409
Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:02 PM
freelander2, on 22 March 2017 - 08:28 PM, said:
I'll let you guess which group asked the questions that needed asking!
I've just pointed out to AC that an officially appointed fans forum already exists and used to meet with the club on a bi-monthly basis in the Eaststand.
This needless to say has only met once this season due to the many issues that have come to light.
I am awaiting his reply.
#410
Posted 23 March 2017 - 12:19 AM
freelander2, on 22 March 2017 - 08:17 PM, said:
Ashley Carson
4 mins
Possible Suggestion. An elected group of say up to 20 supporters to meet with me, once a month at the club to discuss issues and most importantly bring forward ideas and help.
To include a. Is of Male, Female and also if possible representation from the Teenagers.
Could be a way forward with your help?
He's had a beer!
#411
Posted 23 March 2017 - 03:43 AM
BigBlue, on 22 March 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:
Following a meeting with Scoop Nick today, I have decided to continue feeding information from the club to the fans via this forum.
I have received a lot of support from fans and also Mark Crossley and Dean Holden, both who have an affection for the football club.
I will answer question put in a civilised manor.
Please be aware that I won't always answer everything, it is not a question of ignoring, just a question of day job, private life and CFC all demanding my time.
I do want to try to resolve issues, I have asked Dave Allen to write in this weekends programme to also clear a few issues.
I hope all this makes sense, I don't have all the answers and I refuse to take the sole blame for errors in the past, but I hope we can all stop destroying the club and get behind me and help me to bounce back.
Until DA can find a buyer you are stuck with me, depressing for some I know, the alternative is unthinkable if I walk away.
Ashleyc
What does he mean by 'we' all destroy the football club?
If he is attempting to somehow make fans feel culpable for this situation then that's really taking the Michael.
#412
Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:32 AM
Stockholm Spireite, on 22 March 2017 - 09:27 PM, said:
Monkey Tennis?
#414
Posted 23 March 2017 - 06:51 AM
This post has been edited by Exharboroughspireite: 23 March 2017 - 06:51 AM
#415
Posted 23 March 2017 - 07:08 AM
spireitenag, on 22 March 2017 - 11:02 PM, said:
This needless to say has only met once this season due to the many issues that have come to light.
I am awaiting his reply.
Just accept it, he wants to get down with the kids on Facebook!
I suspect that AC has shot it with the vast majority of Bob's Board members, now he is on an exercise of self preservation with other social media groups.
Anyone with any self awareness would realise that the game is well and truly over.
#416
Posted 23 March 2017 - 07:12 AM
#417
Posted 23 March 2017 - 07:19 AM
Nitrous Oxide, on 23 March 2017 - 07:12 AM, said:
For him, Chesterfield FC is Friends Reunited.
#418
Posted 23 March 2017 - 07:45 AM
Nitrous Oxide, on 23 March 2017 - 07:12 AM, said:
Friend reunited closed down last year
#419
Posted 23 March 2017 - 08:43 AM
spireitenag, on 22 March 2017 - 11:02 PM, said:
This needless to say has only met once this season due to the many issues that have come to light.
I am awaiting his reply.
As you quite accurately point out we had a long standing arrangement where fans regularly met officials.
Until 'BB' revealed those fans were lied to at which point these officials became somewhat reluctant.
We had November's fans forum, an occasion for openness and transparency when bridges could be built.
However we subsequently learned it was nothing more than a PR stunt where more >ahem< 'inaccuracies' were peddled.
Then there was the AGM - the shareholders' AGM for Christ's sake - when information on takeover bids and 'FBT's' involvement later proved to be, well, less than accurate, shall we say.
So why should this proposed meeting be any different? How can we suddenly trust someone who's so often misled us in the past?
A handful of 'Lilley Land' contributors might be gullible enough to buy it; experience has taught 'BB' members to adopt a far more sceptical stance.
#420
Posted 23 March 2017 - 08:59 AM
Trigger, on 23 March 2017 - 07:45 AM, said:
Not on Sheffield Road it didn't!