[Spire2003]

Wolves manager sent off for " pitch invasion" admits it was right decision as he broke the law.Should he receive a banning order? Grounds for appeal for anyone who has got one if he doesn't.

[Tora Tora Tora]

Spire2003, on 20 January 2019 - 11:59 AM, said:

Wolves manager sent off for " pitch invasion" admits it was right decision as he broke the law.Should he receive a banning order? Grounds for appeal for anyone who has got one if he doesn't.

That is a valid point my learned friend. But would it not be for just that ground?

[Spire2003]

I guess so but aren't ours only for Proact?

[SuperJackyLester]

Spire2003, on 20 January 2019 - 11:59 AM, said:

Wolves manager sent off for " pitch invasion" admits it was right decision as he broke the law.Should he receive a banning order? Grounds for appeal for anyone who has got one if he doesn't.

Are you comparing the manager running down the touchline to celebrate with players to fans going onto the pitch to protest? Are you for real?

[HoneyTrippa]

Apart from the one silly unfortuneate confrontation with Ashmore the Wolves manager in yesterday's game acted exactly the same as the majority of the Ebbsfleet pitch invasion fans. It was out of pure elation, excitement, relief and celebration. Nothing malicious or sinister in it at all...... just like 99per cent of Ebbsfleet invasion. If anyone apart from the obvious incident receives a banning order from the Ebbsfleet game..... they should appeal using yesterday's Wolves video evidence.

SuperJackyLester, on 20 January 2019 - 12:10 PM, said:

Are you comparing the manager running down the touchline to celebrate with players to fans going onto the pitch to protest? Are you for real?

He ran on the pitch and encroached the field of play during the game. A rule is a rule.

[Johnnyspireite7]

Funny how it was the same referee who didn't send Klopp to the stands when he did exactly the same thing against Everton. Klopp got a retrospective fine.

[RN Blue]

Johnnyspireite7, on 20 January 2019 - 01:10 PM, said:

Funny how it was the same referee who didn't send Klopp to the stands when he did exactly the same thing against Everton. Klopp got a retrospective fine.

He'd obviously had some pointers from the referee assessor and didn't make the same mistake. Most of us learn from our mistakes.

[Oldbury Spireite]

RN Blue, on 20 January 2019 - 01:21 PM, said:

He'd obviously had some pointers from the referee assessor and didn't make the same mistake. Most of us learn from our mistakes.

Or maybe different rules for the bigger clubs

[Johnnyspireite7]

RN Blue, on 20 January 2019 - 01:21 PM, said:

He'd obviously had some pointers from the referee assessor and didn't make the same mistake. Most of us learn from our mistakes.

But shouldn't Espirito Santo get exactly the same punishment, he did get sent to the stands so in theory he's already been punished once so that being the case maybe even a lesser fine. Double Jeopardy. It was pointed out on GOS this morning that Guardiola also did the same thing earlier in the season and got absolutely nothing, no fine or ban, wasn't even spoken to by the FA as far as we know.

[hilly81]

This thread is an absolute belter.

[Valley Blues]

Out of interest, who is going to implement the ban?

Am I correct in thinking that the bans from the Ebbsfleet fixture were solely the decision of the club to ban them? Nothing to do with the police or the FA?

If that is the case, is it genuinely being suggested that Wolves take the step of banning their own manager from the stadium for having the audacity to show some passion with his team in what is increasingly becoming the sterile environment that is the Premier League?

I'm not sure how showing a video of yesterday's Wolves game will help anyone associated with CFC.

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

Johnnyspireite7, on 20 January 2019 - 01:10 PM, said:

Funny how it was the same referee who didn't send Klopp to the stands when he did exactly the same thing against Everton. Klopp got a retrospective fine.

Since the Klopp incident all managers had a directive about leaving the technical area. You’d assume referees had the same brief

[NOFX]

Only if the Ceo of Wolverhampton decides to ban him

[BurySpireite]

You're comparing the rules put in place for a potentially uncontrollable large mob of people to those imposed on a professional manager in his place of work who is identifiable and accountable for his actions.

You know full well it's disingenuous to imply that a horde of football fans poses the same risk to players as does a manager...

[Tora Tora Tora]

BurySpireite, on 20 January 2019 - 04:46 PM, said:

You're comparing the rules put in place for a potentially uncontrollable large mob of people to those imposed on a professional manager in his place of work who is identifiable and accountable for his actions.

You know full well it's disingenuous to imply that a horde of football fans poses the same risk to players as does a manager...

I counter that with two names Gary Caldwell and Dean Saunders. A lot more risk to players.

[martatcross]

Can't find the link but a Charlton fan took a player out sliding into him whoops

[BurySpireite]

Tora Tora Tora, on 20 January 2019 - 07:25 PM, said:

I counter that with two names Gary Caldwell and Dean Saunders. A lot more risk to players.

Touche

[Sammy Spireite]

martatcross, on 20 January 2019 - 07:32 PM, said:

Can't find the link but a Charlton fan took a player out sliding into him whoops

Foot to the gentleman jewels, too?!

Apprently, the player still speaks highly of the fan, though.








*I'll get my coat.....

[calvin plummers socks]

hilly81, on 20 January 2019 - 01:39 PM, said:

This thread is an absolute belter.

A work of genius

[metallilad]

Your looking at it the wrong way.
A member of Wolves' staff encroached onto the playing field without the express permission of the referee resulting in the said member of staff being removed from the touchline and reported to the relevant authorities.

Which leads me to my question.
Did the members of Ebbsfleets staff who ran into the pitch and subsequently confronted the (airhead) supporters in the nets get the same treatment?
Again, an oversight from the already poor referee that was "supposedly" in charge of the match.