Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC: Derbyshire Times Latest - Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC

Jump to content

  • (830 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 828
  • 829
  • 830
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Derbyshire Times Latest

#16581 User is offline   dim view 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21,993
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 01:30 PM

View Postdtp, on 28 March 2024 - 12:28 PM, said:

Can’t think of any benefits, can you?

Yep.
With their promotion bonus secured, it might help those not being retained to find a new club earlier than others whilst reducing our wage bill. For example, Palmer could be in demand at several NL clubs to fight their cause.
Get it on, bang the gong , get it on
0

#16582 User is online   s42blue 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,393
  • Joined: 24-July 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wingerworth
  • Interests:Tarn, cycling.

Posted Today, 01:42 PM

 dim view, on 28 March 2024 - 01:30 PM, said:

Yep.
With their promotion bonus secured, it might help those not being retained to find a new club earlier than others whilst reducing our wage bill. For example, Palmer could be in demand at several NL clubs to fight their cause.


Be interesting to see if Banks, King and Palmer get retained. I think all OOC. Right now nostalgia says keep them all but in the cold light of day I’d probably only keep Banks.
"Can't change or choose your football club. Sorry son"
0

#16583 User is offline   danblue 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members with edit own post
  • Posts: 2,817
  • Joined: 05-September 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 02:01 PM

 s42blue, on 28 March 2024 - 01:42 PM, said:

Be interesting to see if Banks, King and Palmer get retained. I think all OOC. Right now nostalgia says keep them all but in the cold light of day I’d probably only keep Banks.

If released, they won't be without a club for to long.
Personally, I'd offer Banks another season and King and Palmer the same as cover / the roll they play now (tbh, they'd be first teamers in any other NL side).
Although I can see King wanting first team action - at times when Mandeville is making him 3rd choice, you'd probably think about moving on.
Palmer has improved over the season and been brilliant.
Banks is a bit of quality and experience we need but will be a squad player dipping in and out of the starting 11.
0

#16584 User is offline   HaslandBlue58 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members with edit own post
  • Posts: 343
  • Joined: 27-April 23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hasland
  • Interests:CFC,Travel,Real Ale,Music

Posted Today, 02:01 PM

View PostOsborne again, on 28 March 2024 - 12:37 PM, said:

Freckleton could be one name in the frame.

Yes,makes you wonder with him becoming available again certainly.
0

#16585 User is offline   danblue 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members with edit own post
  • Posts: 2,817
  • Joined: 05-September 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 02:08 PM

 Osborne again, on 28 March 2024 - 12:37 PM, said:

Freckleton could be one name in the frame.

I'd wanting playing his natural roll as CB tho. Looked the business when covering for Grimes' suspension
0

#16586 User is offline   dtp 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,553
  • Joined: 29-June 05

Posted Today, 02:09 PM

View Postdim view, on 28 March 2024 - 01:30 PM, said:

Yep.
With their promotion bonus secured, it might help those not being retained to find a new club earlier than others whilst reducing our wage bill. For example, Palmer could be in demand at several NL clubs to fight their cause.


I would suggest that even if the likes of Palmer is in demand then any interested club would only consider taking him on loan. They wouldn’t want to pay 5 months worth of wages for a similar number of games.

Last season we loaned both Dallas and McCallum. Neither ended up at our club nor re-signed for the clubs we loaned them from.

Any players we release will be contracted until 30th June and, certainly, paid until then, and I very much doubt that any of them will have difficulty in finding another club. Their basic problem is that there will not be many teams in the NL willing to pay them an equivalent wage to what they are already on. As such, it’s doubtful they would want to move at this stage for less money.
0

#16587 User is offline   dim view 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21,993
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 02:17 PM

View Postdtp, on 28 March 2024 - 02:09 PM, said:

I would suggest that even if the likes of Palmer is in demand then any interested club would only consider taking him on loan. They wouldn’t want to pay 5 months worth of wages for a similar number of games.

Last season we loaned both Dallas and McCallum. Neither ended up at our club nor re-signed for the clubs we loaned them from.

Any players we release will be contracted until 30th June and, certainly, paid until then, and I very much doubt that any of them will have difficulty in finding another club. Their basic problem is that there will not be many teams in the NL willing to pay them an equivalent wage to what they are already on. As such, it’s doubtful they would want to move at this stage for less money.

Well done. With a bit of application you thought of a benefit. Loan transfers.
Get it on, bang the gong , get it on
0

Share this topic:


  • (830 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 828
  • 829
  • 830
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users