[essexspireman]

Billy Bob, on 30 November 2016 - 06:54 PM, said:

confirmed that Dave Allen stumped up the 200k needed this month

but WHY?

[Spireite-Karl]

What did we learn from that guys n girls?

email your answer to media@chesterfield-fc.co.uk

This post has been edited by Spireite-Karl: 30 November 2016 - 07:05 PM

[The Rec]

essexspireman, on 30 November 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:

but WHY?

Because it's all part of the masterplan which is being played out at the present.

[Guest_freelander2_*]

The Rec, on 30 November 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

Because it's all part of the masterplan which is being played out at the present.

For the good of Chesterfield Football Club, let's hope that David Jones, Chris Breeze, Phil Taylor & Alan Goodall don't budge an inch.

[Somerset Spireite]

essexspireman, on 30 November 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:

but WHY?

Did AC infer that it was loaned to him personally? (He did state that it needs to be repaid quickly).

[essexspireman]

The Rec, on 30 November 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

Because it's all part of the masterplan which is being played out at the present.

exactly because from what was said he has no chance of getting it back quickly

[Zorro]

Spireite-Karl, on 30 November 2016 - 07:01 PM, said:

What did we learn from that guys n girls?

The club are trading insolvent, hence the insolvency companies involvement.
AC needs to prove to them that they can 'trade' out of it.

Z

[Spireite-Karl]

freelander2, on 30 November 2016 - 07:03 PM, said:

For the good of Chesterfield Football Club, let's hope that David Jones, Chris Breeze, Phil Taylor & Alan Goodall don't budge an inch.

I wish the Allen lovers would wake up and smell the coffee!

[azul]

One or two things came out of it. All supplied by AC

Things might go quicker and smoother if the don't invite CT next time.

[Zorro]

essexspireman, on 30 November 2016 - 06:52 PM, said:

but how much has he been getting back in interest?

I think you may find that the short term loans that DA has had to put in got repaid without interest.

Z

[Spireite-Karl]

azul, on 30 November 2016 - 07:06 PM, said:

Things might go quicker and smoother if the don't invite CT next time.

Err, err, err, err, err, err, err, err, can you, err, not sure, err, err, what you're, err, getting at.

[azul]

Zorro, on 30 November 2016 - 07:06 PM, said:

The club are trading insolvent, hence the insolvency companies involvement.
AC needs to prove to them that they can 'trade' out of it.

Z

Well we can't and we are doomed unless DA puts his money in his pocket as he has just done according to AC even though he had nothing to do with the club and its situation.

Also did I hear correctly that DA has sole charge on the ground. What is the status of the other unresolved debentures if that is the case?

[RikShaw]

Zorro, on 30 November 2016 - 07:06 PM, said:

The club are trading insolvent, hence the insolvency companies involvement.
AC needs to prove to them that they can 'trade' out of it.

Z

... And has been trading insolvent (alledgely) since we moved to the b2net in 2010. So how the can he fix that in the next few weeks?

Either there is a master plan to be revealed imminently, or we'll be down the swanny by the end of the year.

This post has been edited by Maverick: 30 November 2016 - 07:15 PM

[Zorro]

azul, on 30 November 2016 - 07:11 PM, said:

Well we can't and we are doomed unless DA puts his money in his pocket as he has just done according to AC even though he had nothing to do with the club and its situation.

Also did I hear correctly that DA has sole charge on the ground. What is the status of the other unresolved debentures if that is the case?

He has the first charge on the ground which means A & S Leisure have first claim to any money if we go t it's up and that is not only before the other directors but the HMRC too, The bank are owed nothing.

Z

[Zorro]

Maverick, on 30 November 2016 - 07:11 PM, said:

... And has been trading insolvent (alledgely) since we moved to the b2net in 2010. So how the can he fix that in the next few weeks?

Either there is a master plan to be revealed imminently, or we'll be down the swans by the end of the year.

Yes we have been trading insolvent since our move, but DA always gave a letter to the auditors which said any debt would be paid by himself personally, therefore CFC could continue to trade.

Since his resignation we don't have that luxury and the accounts can't be signed off. The auditors will have to report that CFC are actually insolvent and until AC comes up with a plan, we are in the brown stuff

Z

[Blue95]

I know everybody has said it and its repeated over and over but just how is chris turner still employed by us? It actually gives me nightmares. Can we set up a just giving page to raise the amount we'd need to pay him off and then gift it to AC and the rest of the groovy gang.

[hilly81]

Glad I couldn't listen by the sounds of things. More spin and nonsense. What a surprise.

[Guest_freelander2_*]

Blue95, on 30 November 2016 - 07:23 PM, said:

I know everybody has said it and its repeated over and over but just how is chris turner still employed by us? It actually gives me nightmares. Can we set up a just giving page to raise the amount we'd need to pay him off and then gift it to AC and the rest of the groovy gang.

He's still in a job because the owner and his right-hand man are happy with the job that he's been doing.

Chris, if you're reading this, Kaven Walker left SWFC in December 2008, could you tell me if he's worked in football since?

[hilly81]

Turner: Dave Allen brought me here bring in tighter financial controls across the board and I've done that #Spireites

Did he actually say this?

[azul]

Zorro, on 30 November 2016 - 07:14 PM, said:

He has the first charge on the ground which means A & S Leisure have first claim to any money if we go t it's up and that is not only before the other directors but the HMRC too, The bank are owed nothing.

Z

I'm sorry to persist but...

When answering my question, DA has "sole' charge on the ground via A&S according to AC not "first' charge on the ground Are they the same?

I's assume they are only same (effectively) if A&S mortgage is greater than the ground/stadium liquidated assets and in this case debenture holders and other secured creditors lose out.

The HMRC always lose out because they aren't secured and are at the end of the queue along with Jackson's Pies